Wednesday, 26 October 2016

Use of mythical technique in the waste land


Click this picture to evaluate my assignment



Use of mythical technique in the waste land

Prepared by- Divya Choudhary
Course- M.A.
Semester- 3
Paper no. - 9
Paper name- Modern Literature
Enrolment no - PG15101007
Batch- 2015-17
Submitted to- Smt. S. B. Gardi Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University





Use of Mythical technique in the Waste Land
Introduction: T.S.Eliot was born in 1888, in St. Louis, Missouri. His first work was “The love song of J.Alfred Prufrock” in 1915. He wrote the poem “The Waste Land” while recovering from the exhaustion. From 1911 to 1914 he returned back to Harvard where he expanded his knowledge by reading Indian philosophy and studying Sanskrit. In 1919, Eliot published poems which contained “Gerontion”.In 1922 his poetic work comes out in shape of “The Waste Land” a complex examination of disillusionment. This work was immediately spread like a virus in all literary corners and it is frequently considered as the most influential work in 20th century. He founded what would become an influential literary journal called ‘Criterion’ (1922-1939).His major works are “Ash Wednesday” (1930), “Four Quartets”(1943),”Use of Criticism”(1933), “After strange Gods”(1934) and received Nobel Prize in literature in 1948. (Wikipedia)
T.S.Eliot ‘The Waste Land’ is an important achievement in the history of English poetry and one of the most talked poems of the 20th century by Thomas Stern Eliot. This poem is very long one including four hundred forty lines which is divided into five parts. They are given below:
(1) The Burial of the Dead
(2) A Game of chess
(3) The fire sermon
(4) Death by water
(5) What the Thunder said



What is a Myth?
“A traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining a natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events” (oxford dictionaries)
An exaggerated or idealized conception of a person or thing: ‘the book is a scholarly study of the Churchill myth’.
A fictitious or imaginary person or thing: ‘nobody had ever heard of Simon’s mysterious friend – Anna said he was a myth’. (oxford dictionaries)
There are many myths which can be observed in this poem. T.S Eliot’s The waste land is an important land mark in the history of English poetry and one of the most talked poems of the same Age. Here T.S Eliot described the mythical background in his poem. This mythical technique can be elaborated as given below.
·         The Grail Legend
·         The King Fisher
·         Myth of Tiresias

The grail Legend:
The Myth about this vessel was that at have acquired medicinal and miraculous properties so the result is that it became an object for purity or one kind of devotion and worship. The lance used to pierce the sides of Christ and kept with it. But a time the original Grail was mysteriously disappeared and many of the bold Knights staked their lives and them searching for this vessel. It was generally believed that the grail was sometimes could be found in the sky as the floating saucer but it could only see by those, Knights who were virginal beauty. (Bhammar)



Picture of the Grail Legend 

Myth of Tiresias:
Here in this poem this myth often comes up to the end of this poem. Tiresias is represented as a bi-sexual in The Waste Land as he was blind but he has the gift of prophecy and immortality. Many stories are same like Tiresias story. According to one story this wise Theban soothsayer in his youth once saw the goddess Athena naked in a pond and goddess struck him blind but his mother was a friend of hers so she bestowed upon him. According to Eliot, Tiresias comes out as the central figure through this poem, what Tiresias sees is the substance of the whole poem. The importance of Tiresias is complex and varied but it is connected with history with the story of King Oedipus, Thebes the classical legend of a waste land. Let’s see the story of King Oedipus in the context of Tiresias and see how it is connected with waste and as a myth. (Bhammar)



Picture of Tiresias


King Fisher:
According to this myth King Fisher was the prince named King Fisher. It was one of the regions where Grail worship had been anciently vogue, and a temple Known as Chapel Perilous, still stood there, broken and dilapidated, as a mournful memorial of what once was, but later had ceased to be. It was said that the lost Grail was hidden in this chapel. At that time the king himself had become a physical wreck, maimed and impotent, as a result. It was whispered, of a sin committed by his soldiery in outraging the chastity of a group of nuns attached to the Grail chapel. The impotency of the Fisher King was reflected sympathetically in the land of which he was the head and ruler. It had become dry and barren, the haunt and home of want and famine. The King, however, was waiting with hope, despite his illness, that one day the Knight of the pure soul would visit his star-crossed kingdom, march to the Chapel Perilous, answer questions and solve riddles. (Rabhadiya)


So, here Eliot shows the Fisher King as symbolic of humanity robbed of its sexuality potency in the modern world and connected to the meaninglessness of urban existence.
There are other symbols like: 

    Ø  Drought
    Ø  Animals
    Ø  Landscape
    Ø  Thunder
    Ø  Religion etc.

So, here this poem The Waste Land is symbolically very rich poem. We rarely find such a variety of symbols except in T.S.Eliot’s Wasteland. Living beings, animal or insect have been the important symbol.

King Oedipus and his Waste land:

Tiresias serves, in the first place to complicate the mythical frame of the poem and in the second place to universalize. Oedipus unwittingly kills his father and marries with his mother and thus call down upon his supposedly innocent head the curse of the gods in form of virulent plague, epidemic an destructive which neither king nor commoners fails to regard as a punishment for some dark and hidden crime. Tiresias, the blind prophet is summoned and when compelled by the king tells the shocking truth that he, the king himself, is the plague spot.  Such is the conspiracy of circumstances that the king is slowly but irresistibly, driven to the realization of this horrible truth. Nothing remains for the king but the duty of expiation, self mutilation, self-exile, self-abasement and a prolonged penance which eventually result in spiritual calm and inner illumination. (Rabhadiya)
Tiresias is represented as a bi-sexual in The Waste Land as he was blind but he has the gift of prophecy and immortality. Many stories are same like Tiresias story. According to one story this wise Theban soothsayer in his youth once saw the goddess Athena naked in a pond and goddess struck him blind but his mother was a friend of hers so she bestowed upon him. According to another story, Tiresias saw two snakes copulating them with his stick and the snakes in wrath transformed him into women. Later on, he was questioned by love and juno as to whether Man is more passionate or woman. He declared that woman is more passionate. At this Juno was angry and stuck him blind but Zesus or Love compensated him by conferring upon the twin gifts of prophecy and immortality.






Please post your comments and suggestions in the comment section.
Thank You....

Works Cited

Bhammar, Bharat. Blog. n.d. 2014. <http://bharatbhammar051314.blogspot.in/2014/10/critical-evaluation-of-waste-land.html>.
oxford dictionaries. n.d. <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/myth>.
Rabhadiya, Vinod. Blog. 14 october 2014. <http://vjrabhadiya.blogspot.in/2014/10/myths-in-waste-land-introduction-t.html>.
Wikipedia. n.d.




Thursday, 24 March 2016

Cultural Studies and it’s Four Goals




Cultural Studies and it’s Four Goals

Prepared by- Divya Choudhary
Course- M.A.
Sem- 2
Paper no. - 8
Paper name- Cultural Studies
Enrolment no. - PG15101007
Batch- 2015-17
Email id- choudharydivya400@gmail.com
Submitted to- Smt. S. B. Gardi Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University
INTRODUCTION

“CULTURAL STUDIES”

            The word “culture” itself it so difficult to pin down, “cultural studies” is hard to define. As we also the case in chapter 8 with Elaine Showalter’s “cultural” model of feminine difference.”Cultural studies “is not so much a discrete approach at all, but rather a set of practices. As Patrick Brantinger has pointed out, cultural studies in not ‘a tightly coherent, unified movement with a fixed agenda”. But a loosely coherent group of tendencies, issues, and question.” Before knowing about Cultural Studies, we should know what culture is. Culture is a anthropology, encompassing the range of human phenomena that cannot be directly attributed to genetic inheritance. The term culture in American anthropology had two meanings-

1 The evolved to classify and represent experiences with symbols and to act imaginatively and creatively.
2 The distinct ways that people live, differently, classified and represent their experiences and acted creatively.
 Culture is central to the way we view, experience and engage with all aspects of our lives and the world around us. Even our definitions are shaped by the historical, political, social and cultural contexts in which we live. Culture is the mode of generating meanings and ideas. This mode of negotiation under which meanings are generated by power relations. Culture is a social phenomenon which tends to regularate the mindset and behavior of people which is set on ancient rules and regularities and experiences. Culture is the identity of particular society and it is the mirror of the society. Culture in a simple way can be said as a particular way of life. Tradition, customs, rules and regulations, norms, artifacts (signs), religions, communities, material things, journey of 'Man' from caves to present day civilization are also culture.
 Opposite of nature is culture. Nature is outside and the moment Man enters, it becomes culture. Whatever which is not nature is culture. All the activities that are done between people on the piece of land and with the other people, culture is the entire range of activities that all the people of the society do. Culture deals with identity. For example, Mahatma Gandhi is the icon of India.
Nature is something which is outside the control of human beings and culture is the introduction of what humans do and think. Culture is the great help out of our present difficulties; Culture beings the pursuit of our total perfection by means of getting to know, on all the matters which has been thought and said in the world: and through his knowledge, turning of stream of fresh and free thoughts upon our stock notions and habits, which we follow but mechanically. When the things are done by elite group, it is called Culture and when the same things are done by minority group, it s called sub-culture. Elite culture controls meanings because it controls the terms of the debate. Non-elite views on life and art are rejected as 'Tasteless', 'useless' or 'even stupid' by the elite. Culture is one of the two or three terms to define. It is an umbrella term. Literature is one of its disciplines. It cannot be understood by one discipline. We are multi-disciplinary. Every discipline studies culture but in a different way. 
   
  
Cultural Studies and it’s Four Goals



CULTURAL STUDIES APPROACHES GENERALLY SHARE FOUR GOALS

First cultural studies transcend the confines of a PARTICULAR DISCIPLINE such as literary criticism or history.

Second cultural studies are politically engaged.

Third cultural studies denies the separation of “HIGH”AND “LOW” OR elite and popular culture.

Forth cultural studies analyze not only the cultural work, but also the means of production.


FIRST GOAL

“Cultural studies transcend the confine of a particular discipline such as literary criticism or history. “practiced in such journal as critical inquiry , representations, and boundary 2 , cultural studies involves scrutinizing the cultural phenomenon of a text – for example Italian opera, a Latino telenovela, the architectural styles of prisons, body piercing and drawing conclusion about the change in textual phenomena over time.

Cultural studies are not necessarily about literature in the traditional sense or even about “art”. In their introduction to cultural studies, editors Lawrence gross berg, Cary nelson, and Paula treichler emphasize that the intellectual promise of cultural studies lies in the attempts to “cut across diverse social and political interests and address many of the struggles within the current scene.”
Intellectual works are not limited by their own “borders” as single texts, historical problems or disciplines, and the critic’s own personal connections to what is being analyzed may also be described.
Henty Giroux and others write in their Dalhousie review manifesto that cultural studies practitioners are “resisting intellectuals” who see what they do as “an emancipator project.” Because it erodes the traditional disciplinary divisions in most institutions of higher education.

SECOND GOAL
     
      “Cultural studies are political engaged” cultural critics see them as “oppositional” not only within their own disciplines but too many of the power structures of society at large. They question inequalities within power structures and seek to discover models for restructuring relationship a many dominant and “minority” or “subaltern” discourses. Because meaning and individual subjectivity are culturally constructed, they can thus be reconstructed. Such a notion, taken to a philosophical extreme, denies the qutonomy of the individual, whether an actual person or a character in literature, a rebuttal of the traditional humanistic “great man” or “great book” theory, and a relocation of aesthetics and cultural from the ideal realms of taste and sensibility, into the arena of a whole society’s everyday life as it is constructed.

THIRD GOAL

      “Cultural studies deny the separation of high and low or elite and popular culture     might hear someone remark at the symphony or art museum: “I came here to get a little culture”.
      Being a “cultured” person used to mean being acquainted with “highbrow” art and intellectual pursuits. But isn’t culture also to be found with a pair of tickets to a rock concert?

      Cultural critics’ today work to transfer the term culture to include mass culture, whether popular, folk, or urban. Following theorists jean baudrillard and Andréa’s huyssen, cultural critics argue that after world war ii the distinctions among high , low and mass culture collapsed , and they cite other theorists such as Pierre boundary and dick hedbige on how “good taste” only reflects prevailing social, economic and political power bases. For example, the images of India that were circulated during the colonial rule of the British raj by writes like by Rudyard Kipling seem innocent , but revel and entrenched imperialist argument for white superiority and worldwide domination of other races, especially Asians. But race along was not the issue for the British raj: money was also a deciding factor. Thus, drawing also upon the ideas of French historian Michel de Certeau, cultural critics examine.

“The practice of every life”

Studying literature as an anthropologist would, as a
Phenomenon of culture, including a culture’s economy,
Rather than determining which the “best” works are
Produced, culture critics describe what is produced and
How carious productions relate to one another. They alms Reveal the political, economic reasons why a certain
Cultural product is move valued at certain times then
others.

FORTH GOAL

“Cultural studies analyze not only the cultural work, but also the means of production.
Marxist critics have long recognized the importance of such par literary questions as these: who supports a given artist? Who publishes his or her books, and how are these books distributed? Who buys books? For those matters, who is literate and who is not? A well – known analysis of literary production is Janice radway’s study of the American romance novel and its readers. Reading the romance women, patriarchy and popular literature, which demonstrates the textual effects of the publishing industry’s decision about books that will minimize its financial risks. Another contribution is the collection reading in America, edited by Cathy n. Davidson, which includes essays on literacy and gender in colonial new England urban magazine audiences in eighteenth century New York city; the impact upon reading such technical innovations as cheaper eyeglasses, electric lights, and trains; the book of the month club; and how writers and texts go through fluctuations of popularity and canonicity. These studies help up recognize that literature dose not occur in a space separate from other concerns of our lives.
Cultural studies thus join subjectivity that is, cultural in relation to individual lives- with engagement, a direct approach to attacking social ills. Though cultural studies practitioners deny “humanism or “the humanities” as universal categories, they strive for what they might call “social reason”, which often (closely) resembles the goals and values of humanistic and democratic ideals.
 Year 2050, the United States will be what demographers call a "majority-minority" population; that is, the present numerical majority of "white", "Caucasian", and "Anglo"- Americans will be the minority, particularly with the dramatically increasing numbers of Latina /o residents, mostly Mexican Americans. As Gerald Graff and James Phelan observe, "It is a common prediction that the culture of the next century will put a premium on people's ability to deal productively with conflict and cultural difference. Learning by controversy is sound training for citizenship in that future".